Tom Ballard’s X article argues official Omarchy packaging shifts responsibility — when agents make apps easy, install checks decide who owns the failure modes.
suryazarc asks dhh and OmarchyLinux "any plans for something like : "omarchy setup secureboot"", saying "lot of gamers with dual boot face this issue"; the still is a "VALORANT" error reading "This build of Vanguard requires TPM 2.0 and Secure Boot to be enabled" with "VAN-9001" and an "EXIT" button.
EpistoAI posts an "Omarchy 4 quality-of-life idea: let the launcher show what an app is ("File Manager") instead of only its brand name ("Flea"), so anyone using your machine can find things." They say "The shell already reads GenericName, it just hides it in search", linking discussion #14497 on omacom/omarchy and tagging dhh; the still is a launcher with "file" typed, listing "File" ("Trigger › Share") and "Flea" ("Apps").
lxztlr says the German computer magazine c't featured an article on Omarchy and adds "Of course, it wasn't about the technology."; the still is the article page from c't 21/2026 S. 14 headed "Oligarchen-Linux" with the subhead "Der rasante und problematische Aufstieg von Omarchy" by Sylvester Tremmel.
